Showing posts with label NSG. Show all posts
Showing posts with label NSG. Show all posts

NSG tightens rules, but US reassures India

New Delhi
24 June 2011

Access to sensitive nuclear technologies used for the enrichment of uranium or the reprocessing of spent nuclear fuel just got tougher, with the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) approving new guidelines to limit their transfers only to the countries complying with their non-proliferation obligations and that meet agreed standards for nuclear safeguards, safety and security.

On the face of it, the three non-NPT signatories of India, Pakistan and Israel could be affected by the amendments, but, equally, other countries of concern could be the targets, too. However, the US department of state has clarified that the new restrictions should not be construed as detracting from the "unique impact and importance" of the US-India nuclear deal or diluting the US' commitment to full civil nuclear cooperation with India.

Simply put, the new guidelines would not impinge or adversely affect the "clean" NSG exception given to India in September 2008 or restrict India's access to enrichment and reprocessing (ENR) technologies. Also, India remains on course for becoming the 47th member of the nuclear cartel, which was formed in 1974 in response to the nuclear test by India earlier that year.

A US state department press release said, "The NSG's NPT references, including those in the ENR guidelines, in no way detract from the exception granted to India by NSG members in 2008 and in no way reflect upon India's non-proliferation record." It also noted that "efforts in the NSG to strengthen controls on the transfers of ENR are consistent with long-standing US policy that pre-dates the civil nuclear agreement [with India] and have been reaffirmed on an annual basis by the G-8 for years."

Further, it iterated the US' support for India's membership of the NSG and three other export control regimes -- the Australia Group, the Wassenaar Arrangement, and the Missile Technology Control Regime -- in a phased manner. The US was understood to have circulated a note on India's membership of the NSG, proposing in it that signing on to the NPT need not be a mandatory criterion. India recognises that becoming an NSG member will take time because the group operates by consensus, and all members, China included, need to unanimously make a decision.

On the eve of the NSG's meeting, India had voiced deep reservations about a move by the cartel to withhold the transfer of enrichment and reprocessing (ENR) technology to the non-NPT signatories. It had contended that doing so would dilute the import or the message of the exemption granted to India in 2008. Recently, foreign secretary Nirupama Rao had discussed this, and other matters, with Ellen Tauscher, the US under secretary of state for arms control and international security affairs, in Vienna. Ms Rao had also impressed upon her American interlocutor that India's membership of the four export control regimes should be a package deal.

Australia may insist on test ban and sending its own nuclear inspectors; Howard calls PM, discusses uranium sale

New Delhi
16 August 2007

Australia could send its own inspectors for checking Indian nuclear
plants to ensure proper use of the uranium it might supply, according to Australian
Foreign Minister Alexander Downer.

"This will provide still more safeguards than we currently have," he told the Australian
Broadcasting Corporation. He sought to suggest that a bilateral safeguards arrangement,
in addition to a similar agreement with the International Atomic Energy Agency, would
help prevent the use of Australian uranium in the Indian nuclear weapons programme.

The chairman of the Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, Mr Ziggy
Switkowski, went a step further to seek an Indian commitment to abandon nuclear testing
in future. He expected a ban on nuclear testing to be part of any cooperation between
India and Australia.

India will have to play by acceptable international rules if she wanted Australian
uranium, he was quoted as saying in the Herald Sun newspaper.

"To be allowed access in one case to American technology for new generation reactors
and to our high quality uranium you've got to be prepared to accommodate the rules that
govern reasonable international behaviour," Switkowski said. "I think continuing
weapons testing would compromise that kind of a situation. I think at that stage we have
to reverse out of the agreement in terms of supplying Australian uranium."

The statements by Mr Downer and Mr Switkowski come on a day when Australian Prime
Minister John Howard telephoned Prime Minister Manmohan Singh to inform him of the
decision of the Australian Government regarding sale of uranium to India. The national
security committee of the Australian Cabinet on Tuesday decided in principle to export
uranium to India, conditional on agreed safeguards. Australia has the world's largest
known reserves of uranium.

The spokesman of the Ministry of External Affairs said: "The Prime Minister thanked
Prime Minister Howard. It was agreed that the matter would be discussed further at the
official level."

In Sydney, Mr Howard said that safeguards to prevent the use of the nuclear fuel in
weapons would be put in place. "Before effect is given to the in-principle decision we
have taken there'll also need to be a satisfactory finalisation of the negotiations between
India and the United States," he said.

The opposition Labour Party has demanded that the Australian Government immediately
review the pending decision to sell the uranium to India. Labour Party Foreign Affairs
Spokesman Robert McClelland said in Canberra: "The US State Department has now
made clear that the US-India agreement is off if India do go ahead with a nuclear
weapons test. So the foreign minister must immediately make clear whether the Howard
Government was prepared to take their proposed nuclear deal off the table if India
conducts nuclear weapons tests." The Indian Government, he said, won't rule out nuclear
testing and Australia has multiple international treaty obligations that the Government
should uphold. He added that Labour, if elected, would overturn any decision to sell
uranium to India and would lobby as a member of the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) to
block such exports.